Many people who bet regularly take time to research before placing any money. They don’t do this out of habit but because they know the risk of acting on false or incomplete information.
One of the clearest illustrations of this comes from Yougov.co.uk’s Global Gambling Profiles, which found that 39% of gamblers in the United Kingdom say ease-of-use of the platform and their reliability are one of the most important factors when choosing where to place a bet.
This focus on usability reflects a broader trend of people checking for verified features and functions before trusting a service. When platforms are unclear or confusing, or if they don’t match what users expect, people often report dissatisfaction or stop using them altogether.
Verified Information Prevents Assumptions
Relying on assumptions when signing up to a new betting platform can result in unwanted surprises. Offers may look attractive on the surface but often come with terms that are not immediately visible. Inaccurate claims can mislead people into thinking a platform has certain games or betting odds, only to find out otherwise after they’ve made deposits.
For example, a user might find a site claiming to offer 300% deposit bonuses, only to later realize the bonus has a high rollover requirement and tight withdrawal limits. That’s why sources that verify such claims are valuable.
On review platforms like Gamble Insiders, users can find comprehensive reviews of casino and sports betting sites. The platform, available at gambleinsiders.com, checks whether promotional offers are actually available and assesses if the terms hold up after registration.
They examine the types of games or bets offered and evaluate if the service matches its marketing. This helps users avoid platforms that oversell or misrepresent what they offer.
Claims Should Match Reality
Some betting platforms promote features like fast withdrawals, live betting, or round-the-clock support. These features can be important for people looking for a consistent service, but it’s not always clear whether these claims match the actual experience.
In these cases, regulatory bodies like the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) – mga.org.mt play a key role. This includes requiring them to accurately represent their services and uphold players’ rights through enforceable consumer protections.
For example, an operator might promote a welcome bonus, but the MGA ensures that any conditions such as wagering requirements or expiration dates must be plainly disclosed. This level of transparency helps users make informed decisions and avoids the frustration of hidden clauses.
Research-Based Choices Lead to Better Outcomes
When people make decisions based on facts rather than assumptions, they are more likely to choose platforms that actually meet their needs and avoid unnecessary risk. According to a Ipsos.com survey from 2022, individuals who rely on verified sources before choosing a betting service report fewer complaints and express more satisfaction with their overall experience.
This supports a broader public attitude captured in Ipsos research, which found that a large majority of sports fans in the United States believe betting should be treated as a personal choice—one that, when exercised, should be done with full knowledge of what’s involved. This reinforces the idea that freedom of choice carries more value when paired with the right information. (Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/sports-betting-everywhere-how-do-americans-feel-about-it)
By depending on well-checked sources, people reduce the chances of running into unexpected fees, short-lived promotions, or missing options. In the long term, these research-based decisions make betting more manageable and help avoid repeat issues like switching services or chasing bonuses that don’t hold up.
Trust Is Earned Through Transparency
Transparency and accountability are becoming more central in how regulated betting services aim to build lasting relationships with users. According to the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), the sector has increasingly focused on strengthening responsible play and making their operations more open.
In their first sustainability report, EGBA outlined efforts that included the introduction of a pan-European code of conduct on responsible advertising, which began being independently monitored during major events like EURO 2020. One of the key data points from that report showed a 133% year-on-year increase in the number of personalized communications sent to users about their betting habits.
As a result, 75% of users used these tools in 2020, up from 63% in 2019. Such transparency, both in advertising standards and in reporting progress, supports a more informed public. It also addresses the need to counterbalance the increasing visibility of unregulated platforms.
The EGBA emphasizes that competitive, well-regulated environments not only encourage safer user behavior but also help steer people away from services that do not follow the same standards. When this kind of information is made available to users, it helps set fair expectations and supports informed decisions.